| 1 |
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:24:03 -0400 |
| 2 |
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> The point being made, then, is that for an official package manager to |
| 5 |
> exist *for Gentoo*, it needs to be under *Gentoo's* control. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Well, the source is open, and there are already enough Gentoo devs working |
| 8 |
on it, so it's not like Gentoo can't control what's being used. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Let's say paludis does become the official PM for Gentoo. This would |
| 11 |
undoubtedly mean that (even more) Gentoo developers would be working on it, |
| 12 |
likely with Ciaran's (or anyone else without @gentoo.org's) contributions. |
| 13 |
How is that different from non-developers submitting patches to portage? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Kind regards, |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Andrej |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives