| 1 |
On 09:55 Mon 10 Oct , Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:08:43 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 10:21 Sun 09 Oct , Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > We're calling it with '--patch-only' to avoid heavy changes to |
| 6 |
> > > ebuilds. This should handle gracefully eautoreconfed packages and |
| 7 |
> > > those not using libtool as well (in worst case, it should try to |
| 8 |
> > > apply patches twice). |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > What kind of testing have you done? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Simple testing on a few packages of mine. If you have something |
| 13 |
> specific in mind, please be more accurate. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It's probably better to test on other people's code, since your own will |
| 16 |
always use eclass code in the way you imagine it being used. For changes |
| 17 |
to popular eclasses like this, I'd go find a cross-section of 25+ |
| 18 |
packages written by a variety of people besides yourself (or just test |
| 19 |
all 87 in the tree). Bonus points for those written by the most and |
| 20 |
least experienced devs, who I'd expect to use things in more |
| 21 |
unexpected/unlikely ways. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Donnie |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 28 |
Council Member / Sr. Developer |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 30 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.com |
Archives