1 |
Mike Doty schrieb: |
2 |
> All- |
3 |
> |
4 |
> We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only |
5 |
> devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate in |
6 |
> bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the |
7 |
> gentoo-project list will be created to take over what -dev frequently becomes. |
8 |
> there is no requirement to be on this new list. |
9 |
|
10 |
Hmm, interesting. Should "We're going to change..." be interpreted as a |
11 |
fact and the voting itself is only a formal thing? |
12 |
Because if that's the case, we can close -dev completely and just keep |
13 |
-announcement and admire the decisions made by some people. |
14 |
|
15 |
> |
16 |
> This will probably remove the need for -core(everything gets leaked out anyway) |
17 |
> but that's a path to cross later. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> We're voting on this next council meeting so if you have input, now would be |
20 |
> the time. |
21 |
|
22 |
Let's go for censorship! Let's vote for gagging those users who don't |
23 |
have any idea of development and those ex-devs who think they still have |
24 |
anything to say. |
25 |
|
26 |
And to give that comment a technical side: |
27 |
- Do you think that any dev will regularly check for messages written by |
28 |
users he barely knows and give his ok? Risking being moderated himself |
29 |
if somebody else with magic foo thinks that the post was inappropriate? |
30 |
- Who decides/defines when a post is a bad post? |
31 |
- What if one dev thinks a post is inappropriate and rejects it, can |
32 |
another dev still let it through? |
33 |
- Why not just make -core o+r if you think that it gets leaked out |
34 |
anyway and leave -dev as it is? |
35 |
- When do we start with the moderation of -project? |
36 |
|
37 |
Cheers. |