| 1 |
Add missing TAR-PORTABILITY reference to the citation from the article. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/689416 |
| 4 |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 5 |
--- |
| 6 |
glep-0078.rst | 5 +++-- |
| 7 |
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
diff --git a/glep-0078.rst b/glep-0078.rst |
| 10 |
index bd237a2..3cbbdd2 100644 |
| 11 |
--- a/glep-0078.rst |
| 12 |
+++ b/glep-0078.rst |
| 13 |
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Type: Standards Track |
| 14 |
Status: Draft |
| 15 |
Version: 1 |
| 16 |
Created: 2018-11-15 |
| 17 |
-Last-Modified: 2018-11-30 |
| 18 |
-Post-History: 2018-11-17 |
| 19 |
+Last-Modified: 2019-07-08 |
| 20 |
+Post-History: 2018-11-17, 2019-07-08 |
| 21 |
Content-Type: text/x-rst |
| 22 |
--- |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
@@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ of individual tar features has been conducted. The research concluded: |
| 25 |
timestamps and user/group identifiers, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- using pax attributes for extended metadata and/or volume label. |
| 28 |
+ [#TAR-PORTABILITY]_ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
It has been determined that for the purpose of binary package we really |
| 31 |
only need to be concerned about long paths and huge files. Therefore, |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
2.22.0 |
Archives