| 1 |
19.11.2005, 23:19:41, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 03:20:57PM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>> I would have preferred that the people involved with this could |
| 6 |
>> have directly asked infra if this would work for us. That's a simple |
| 7 |
>> request that I did not see from these folks. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> It's a crazy notion, but y'all could've commented in the *TWO* months |
| 10 |
> that this glep has been percolating, "yo, what do you want from an |
| 11 |
> infra standpoint?". |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Or implemented anoncvs in the meantime, thus nuking the main request |
| 14 |
> that's being made of infra. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
/ne notes there's been no such thing like subdomains in the *original* |
| 17 |
(rejected) GLEP... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
jakub |
Archives