| 1 |
18.02.2014 13:39, Ben de Groot пишет: |
| 2 |
> On 12 February 2014 07:04, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> It's sad that people don't follow common sense (which happens to be the |
| 6 |
>> GNOME highlights) |
| 7 |
>> and that everything must be turned into a policy of somesort so people |
| 8 |
>> get it. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> [...] |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Just make the gnome gtk3 policy the guideline if you must. It's just |
| 13 |
>> documenting common sense. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It seems that only the Gnome team regards this as common sense. |
| 17 |
> Others, such as the Qt team and QA regard the versioned useflag |
| 18 |
> solution as more sensible. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I think we can conclude that there is no perfect solution, and we |
| 21 |
> simply have different preferences. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> That said, I'm not sure we absolutely need a policy. Though I would |
| 24 |
> agree it would be more elegant if we can solve this matter, to make it |
| 25 |
> easier to grasp by our users. In that case the QA proposal makes sense |
| 26 |
> to me. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
We definitely NEED the policy, cause if we do not - current situation |
| 30 |
will continue to confuse users and even developers about how to do |
| 31 |
things properly. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
But we should come to the policy together and then - force it together. |
| 34 |
We really do not want to force anyone in a way he does not like, but if |
| 35 |
we will do nothing about this - it will remain a problem as it is now. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 39 |
Gentoo developer |
| 40 |
Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead |
| 41 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |
| 42 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives