Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: Lloyd D Budd <lloyd@×××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why should copyright assignment be a requirement?
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 01:15:34
Message-Id: 200308220115.32507.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why should copyright assignment be a requirement? by Lloyd D Budd
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 But, as was pointed out by someone else, if one were to choose not to assign a
5 dual copyright to Gentoo and the license was violated, nothing would stop
6 them from doing so later on... right?
7
8 On Friday 22 August 2003 12:47 am, Lloyd D Budd wrote:
9 > IMNAL, but the "standard reason" for SOLE ownership, or ("dual, but not
10 > shared copyright") is to enable legal pursuit of license violators. The
11 > interesting side effect is that a copyright owner can license
12 > distribution, or other rights, under additional licenses.
13 >
14 > On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 20:35, Luke-Jr wrote:
15 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
16 > > Hash: SHA1
17 > >
18 > > I must have read the thread incorrectly at some point, then. I thought
19 > > the purpose of Gentoo (co-)owning the copyright was the prevent the
20 > > creator from making it proprietary. What exactly does it achive to have
21 > > Gentoo (co-)own copyrights on them? I have no objection to the idea, but
22 > > I see no actual *reason* why it should be required...
23 > >
24 > > On Thursday 21 August 2003 06:00 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote:
25 > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:49:25PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
26 > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
27 > > > > Hash: SHA1
28 > > > >
29 > > > > Even if the owner were to change the license, they could not change
30 > > > > it on ebuilds already released under the GPL.
31 > > >
32 > > > I'm aware, thank you. I don't need to have the basics of copyright law
33 > > > explained to me.
34 > >
35 > > - --
36 > > Luke-Jr
37 > > Developer, Gentoo Linux
38 > > http://www.gentoo.org/
39 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
40 > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
41 > >
42 > > iD8DBQE/RWVHZl/BHdU+lYMRApjkAJ9CBki4BH5q3wABFpoNN5fxe3C+rQCcDP9k
43 > > hScPDIpYKARrj7oGU74ck8s=
44 > > =FlRV
45 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 > >
47 > >
48 > > --
49 > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
50
51 - --
52 Luke-Jr
53 Developer, Gentoo Linux
54 http://www.gentoo.org/
55 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
56 Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
57
58 iD8DBQE/RW6wZl/BHdU+lYMRAmmcAJ9fptrZpQAymHkWz8ub6GnLyg9+9gCfX+qn
59 0QzNxAGwQ4NHiZCBULhgbDY=
60 =OGZs
61 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
62
63
64 --
65 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why should copyright assignment be a requirement? Lloyd D Budd <lloyd@×××××××××××.com>