Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:14:02
Message-Id: 45DBB83B.4070509@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:58:48 -0800 Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o>
3 > wrote:
4 > | Brian Harring wrote:
5 > | [snip]
6 > | > In light of that, don't really see any reason for the council to
7 > | > *not* get a status update on it.
8 > |
9 > | We get "status" updates on it. it's pretty much "it's not done, we
10 > | don't want to show you" every month. It's one of the things I intend
11 > | to bring up at the march meeting.
12 >
13 > You're ignoring our offer to show you what's done, eh? Fair enough.
14 >
15 I was never offered this offer.
16
17 --
18 =======================================================
19 Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
20 Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
21 Gentoo Council
22 Gentoo Developer Relations
23 Gentoo Infrastructure
24 GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
25 =======================================================
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies