Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o, gentoo-dev@l.g.o, anthony@××××××××××.com, dmonnier@××.edu, markusle@×××××.com, mtindal@××××××××××××.com, webkiller71@××××.be, ps.m@×××.net, bgb@×××××.com, co@××××××××.com, tocharian@××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:33:15
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.60.0409211822120.22429@lacewing.inforead.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain by Ned Ludd
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ned Ludd wrote:
5
6 > Good afternoon gentlemen. Thanks for your feedback to the other thread.
7 >
8 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
9 > 8) Supporting new arches.
10 >
11 > Currently only x86/amd64/sparc64 are supported by the hardened
12 > toolchain.
13 >
14
15 My hardened SS20 (sparc32) feels neglected... :)
16
17
18 > Thanks for your time and I look fwd to working with you guys (gals?).
19 > --
20 > Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
21 > Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer
22 >
23
24 Regards,
25 - --
26 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
27 Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc)
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
30
31 iD8DBQFBUHIqQa6M3+I///cRAqGNAJ4l+buPHXOxJfZ8l7Ue1gcLJ+8fawCfSPtN
32 R2SzM65x4Vr43qOmbSNwWrI=
33 =WL22
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
35
36 --
37 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list