1 |
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 12:34 +0200, Edgar Hucek wrote: |
2 |
> Apeal on extended testing : |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you |
5 |
> release it. |
6 |
|
7 |
I hear this (pardon my "French") BULLSHIT all the time from our |
8 |
developers. Look, people, I asked multiple times for assistance with |
9 |
testing. Guess what? Very few developers did any testing. We started |
10 |
a Release Tester program to try to improve testing. It helped somewhat, |
11 |
bust most of the release testers never bothered doing installations. |
12 |
Some of them were very helpful, but most didn't do much of anything. |
13 |
|
14 |
Release Engineering can not, and WILL not, be responsible for the state |
15 |
of all 10,000+ packages and all of their possible USE combinations. |
16 |
That is the individual ebuild maintainer job. Our job is to make sure |
17 |
that the *media* works with the *default* set of USE as we have laid |
18 |
out. If something other than what is provided by us does not work, it |
19 |
is *not* our fault, nor our responsibility. |
20 |
|
21 |
Remember that our releases are a snapshot of the state of the tree. If |
22 |
the tree is messed up, then it will be reflected in the tree. If you |
23 |
want better releases, quit trying to lay blame on other people and get |
24 |
off your ASS and HELP fix the problems. Seriously, if you want to see |
25 |
improved releases, then help out. Quit your bitching, as it doesn't |
26 |
accomplish *anything* to improve the releases. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Chris Gianelloni |
30 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
31 |
x86 Architecture Team |
32 |
Games - Developer |
33 |
Gentoo Linux |