Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

[Michael Krelin]

>>> the werent the same question nor were they the same answer
>> They weren't the same, but the second answer was definitely wrong:
>>>> So is alternative package manager support something that's considered
>>>> important and a priority by the Council?
>>> yes
>>>
>>>> Did you not say that finding alternatives to Portage is one of Gentoo's
>>>>
>>>>> priorities?
>>> no i did not, nor does that apply here
>> because it explicitly states that you *did not* say it (and the wording
>> doesn't differ enough to justify it), not only that it doesn't apply.
>
> i think the use of negatives has confused you ... the answers i posted to
> ciaranm's questions in both cases are correct
>
> one of Gentoo's priorities is to enable alternative package managers to
> coexist sanely ... it is not one of Gentoo's priorities at this time to
> replace Portage with a different package manager

I don't think either question implied replacing portage, but nevermind.
As, I believe, I mentioned once, it's nothing but a hairsplitting. You
made yourself clear enough.

Love,
H
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list