1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 10:15:05 schrieb Duncan: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> What I would have expected to see here (and in other docs-related patches) |
7 |
> would be cleanly separate EAPI-5 vs. EAPI-6 descriptions, on separate |
8 |
> lines, so when EAPI-5 support cleanup time comes, it's easy to simply |
9 |
> delete EAPI-5 lines. Something like: |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
Well... In a way that certainly makes sense. However, ... |
13 |
|
14 |
Once this is out I would personally prefer all bumps to be also EAPI bumps, |
15 |
and all new perl-module.eclass ebuilds to use EAPI=6. Adding extensive |
16 |
documentation about EAPI=5 seems to be counterproductive there. |
17 |
|
18 |
- -- |
19 |
|
20 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
21 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
22 |
dilfridge@g.o |
23 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
24 |
|
25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.1 |
27 |
|
28 |
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWbIOqXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w |
29 |
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF |
30 |
MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5AAoJEOE4b9fvS1d5sYgQALR5eWY3YmiNNuBfUJhNC5Lg |
31 |
04/VY+vIohGVBRk8fQbxtbEMad2fE4Wyo/K9Jc3N1JBQ4PyZKpZlborggPzKOQfz |
32 |
1Mv2OPP3blvV64nKfFZgta4n+viI6r41EYEPu4M68+DO7CCea5oSBt3+72puLYlP |
33 |
o4d1YkxiAnR1A9BOIzYW8R8CDqgpuKsg6SLamyx3bSuGRrdxIWYGdnOVf71wpTCV |
34 |
kxF/eODEbBUxaQON/sY7lFFVAmcSrXCJdwnYzdaDFgyz+cAdUhpfNVjMdrrxl166 |
35 |
SE2zYsATNx/DGBQufcTfjBcwPEzYfNCtBTbhau/o18b460gY97t5y1UvBp3dwPin |
36 |
z/esjhGHvtyTKE+8eFpACqaDKsTYjmIJvzPG5vZ43pRAux0UqvnHxTpf7cQDJRYk |
37 |
QM+8nyJ2OeoxkJhG6iyXDkmX+cW/LepNUnsnimHIpq8D9ipRW+qox2AUvY6bL29r |
38 |
M9pTCWTC3j+ZAsZ9/0JIvs9O7t5SwGlziDS2jSbHCSxJn5a1DqonFq7EpF+N99oA |
39 |
RAt85kps2XVNuP5kZgHZok4i/155q34aPVG6k8XrPTsFwEt/Mo1b3d+bWnEcHZmY |
40 |
4qTvBXHIEzeGJlRn6d3yU1t+77Chmrf0sPVrB2ebmT/itPK/HMZD6l+FWFmbJ37J |
41 |
p9bFcEsWcFAyh7VITyJh |
42 |
=jmuY |
43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |