1 |
Hallo, |
2 |
|
3 |
Another idea: we could mark the service xdm (and maybe other services too) as a 'high priority' service, that is to be started as soon as possible. I have no need of sshd and sendmail being run before I can start an X session. Is that feasible? That might save some people a few more seconds. |
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:19:06 -0500 |
7 |
Joseph Pingenot <trelane@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
8 |
|
9 |
> Howdy. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Saw this linked to off of NewsForge today, and thought it'd be great if |
12 |
> the gentoo boot process made use of the idea. Essentially, it seems to |
13 |
> be saying "start services in parallel". |
14 |
> The link: |
15 |
> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-boot.html |
16 |
> Thoughts? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> -Joseph |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -- |
21 |
> Joseph===============================================trelane@××××××××××.net |
22 |
> "That is the key to the real monopoly in Redmond. _They_ control your data. |
23 |
> Their products have the content needed to do your work locked up in their |
24 |
> semantics, and their binary formats. Before we can start creating a bold |
25 |
> new world, we've got to free the hostage content." --Jody Goldberg, on /. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |