| 1 |
Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:38, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> I think Chris's primary concern is one of "Tell us whats up before it |
| 5 |
>>> happens." |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> why should he care ? some Gentoo guys take catalyst and produce |
| 8 |
>> stage4s directed at certain applications |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> He cares because they're basically extending the roll of releng without |
| 11 |
> it being under releng's control. I know I'd be annoyed if they release a |
| 12 |
> x86 stage4 and then *I* gets bugs, but I know absolutely nothing about |
| 13 |
> it. Having 2 projects doing almost the same thing is just going to |
| 14 |
> confuse users. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and |
| 17 |
has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also |
| 18 |
have a releng liaison, which seems to resolve the main dispute here. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Donnie |
Archives