| 1 |
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:03:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| > Could we get GLEP 31 (Character Sets for Portage Tree Items) added? |
| 4 |
| > The only issue holding it back is that a few developers have stated |
| 5 |
| > outright that they refuse to comply with it, and I don't see it as |
| 6 |
| > fair to make other developers suffer nasty repoman errors because |
| 7 |
| > of things a select few will end up breaking... |
| 8 |
| |
| 9 |
| it was approved once already, just retracted after that fact pending |
| 10 |
| further developments in terms of application/developer support |
| 11 |
| (editors not sucking so much for example) ... so does it really need |
| 12 |
| to be approved again ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What I mean is... Is the council prepared to commit itself to helping |
| 15 |
with enforcement of the GLEP? Adding repoman enforcement would be |
| 16 |
trivial, but repoman is circumventable -- the GLEP is withdrawn because |
| 17 |
several developers have said that they'll do just that anyway. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 21 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 22 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives