Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:07:59
Message-Id: CAPDe-1NTprhFT01x2p+peb9s_V8AXg9p4JnMR5u0Yozhc=wqgg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to move use.local.desc somewhere in /var by Brian Dolbec
1 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:45 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
3 >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400
4 >> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
5 >>
6 >> > On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
7 >> > > Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three
8 >> > > days if there are no objections. But I'd like some feedback for the
9 >> > > move of the file in /var. Opinions?
10 >> >
11 >> > considering the server generates it and the end user never does, i
12 >> > don't see the point.  they get it via the normal `emerge --sync`
13 >> > process. -mike
14 >>
15 >> Maybe we should consider moving it to metadata/?
16 >>
17 >> On the other hand, moving it will require fixing all tools using it.
18 >> And as it is already deprecated, I don't see much good in still working
19 >> on it.
20 >>
21 >
22 > I agree, a sudden move (3 days) will cause nuisance breakage.  If
23 > anything, lets firm up the schedule for it's removal, so that all tools
24 > can be updated to use cat/pkg/metadata.xml only for local flags.
25 >
26 > Otherwise there will be a lot of user noise generated over broken tools
27 > such as several gentoolkit utilities, porthole, kuroo, kportagetray,...
28 > --
29 > Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
30
31 I said three days for the .cvsignore, not for moving the file to /var