Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:17:42
Message-Id: 20160617081717.7da51204.mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW by Andrew Savchenko
1 On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:23:06 +0300
2 Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:10:40 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:40:39 +0200
6 > > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:
7 > >
8 > > > On 16-06-2016 19:37:55 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
9 > > > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:52:32 +0200
10 > > > > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:
11 > > > >
12 > > > > > On 16-06-2016 16:37:10 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
13 > > > > > > > P.S. Please don't CC me when replying to my e-mails on the list,
14 > > > > > > > since I'm already subscribed to the list.
15 > > > > > >
16 > > > > > > Please don't expect others to keep blacklists of people who can't
17 > > > > > > handle their mail properly, or to generally harm others and ignore good
18 > > > > > > practices because you can't handle your mail.
19 > > > > >
20 > > > > > You mean ignoring the Reply-To header is "good practice"?
21 > > > >
22 > > > > It's not being ignored, as you can see by the occurrence of the mailing
23 > > > > list in CC.
24 > > >
25 > > > From RFC 5322:
26 > > >
27 > > > When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es) to
28 > > > which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent. In the
29 > > > absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to
30 > > > the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise
31 > > > specified by the person composing the reply.
32 > > >
33 > > > In other words, you sent it to me, while I requested you to send it to
34 > > > the list.
35 > >
36 > > 'Suggests'. But if you insist, file a bug and stop bothering me. I'm
37 > > not maintaining nor developing any mail client.
38 >
39 > Claws mail definitely allows proper replies; just grep for
40 > X-Mailer header containing "Claws Mail" in this list and see how
41 > replies are made.
42 >
43 > It looks like that problem is in how client is configured. That's
44 > why we are borthering you :)
45
46 If by 'proper replies', you mean not using 'reply all', then it's
47 a serious problem with the people using them. Anyway, your offtopic is
48 over on my end. If you have any more problems, please bother comrel.
49
50 --
51 Best regards,
52 Michał Górny
53 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o>