1 |
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:23:06 +0300 |
2 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:10:40 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:40:39 +0200 |
6 |
> > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > On 16-06-2016 19:37:55 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
9 |
> > > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:52:32 +0200 |
10 |
> > > > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > > > On 16-06-2016 16:37:10 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
13 |
> > > > > > > P.S. Please don't CC me when replying to my e-mails on the list, |
14 |
> > > > > > > since I'm already subscribed to the list. |
15 |
> > > > > > |
16 |
> > > > > > Please don't expect others to keep blacklists of people who can't |
17 |
> > > > > > handle their mail properly, or to generally harm others and ignore good |
18 |
> > > > > > practices because you can't handle your mail. |
19 |
> > > > > |
20 |
> > > > > You mean ignoring the Reply-To header is "good practice"? |
21 |
> > > > |
22 |
> > > > It's not being ignored, as you can see by the occurrence of the mailing |
23 |
> > > > list in CC. |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > From RFC 5322: |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es) to |
28 |
> > > which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent. In the |
29 |
> > > absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to |
30 |
> > > the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise |
31 |
> > > specified by the person composing the reply. |
32 |
> > > |
33 |
> > > In other words, you sent it to me, while I requested you to send it to |
34 |
> > > the list. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > 'Suggests'. But if you insist, file a bug and stop bothering me. I'm |
37 |
> > not maintaining nor developing any mail client. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Claws mail definitely allows proper replies; just grep for |
40 |
> X-Mailer header containing "Claws Mail" in this list and see how |
41 |
> replies are made. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> It looks like that problem is in how client is configured. That's |
44 |
> why we are borthering you :) |
45 |
|
46 |
If by 'proper replies', you mean not using 'reply all', then it's |
47 |
a serious problem with the people using them. Anyway, your offtopic is |
48 |
over on my end. If you have any more problems, please bother comrel. |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Best regards, |
52 |
Michał Górny |
53 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |