| 1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2021, David Seifert wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 19:50 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Interesting. You don't even now my view on this but you already have |
| 5 |
>> an opinion and are saying that I am the culprit. I think this is |
| 6 |
>> called "prejudiced". |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> To this day, we're still waiting for your view/statement/rebuttal of the |
| 9 |
> points, but have yet to receive anything. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
>> I am pretty sure that as a ComRel member you will abstain |
| 12 |
>> from this case as you seem to be superior. I mean you are publicly |
| 13 |
>> attacking me for 10+ months, rejected any attempt from my side when I |
| 14 |
>> tried to speak with you to get things sorted and now you showed how |
| 15 |
>> biased your are... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> The last message I received from you was on 10 Jul. I have sent 3 |
| 18 |
> follow-up messages before Monday, 12 Jul (when the Bernd low hit |
| 19 |
> Germany). Since then, nothing. And before you invoke the Bernd argument: |
| 20 |
> I'm also a first responder, and while the high Rhine wasn't nearly as |
| 21 |
> badly affected as the middle Rhine/Eifel area in terms of floodings, I |
| 22 |
> understand that you might not have had the time to respond (even though |
| 23 |
> you pushed 19 commits to ::gentoo on 13 Jul). That said, "let me check |
| 24 |
> whether soap wrote something in PM" seems to have never occurred since |
| 25 |
> 12 Jul at any point, which raises doubts as to whether this is such a |
| 26 |
> critical issue after all... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Can you please take this discussion private? gentoo-dev is a technical |
| 29 |
mailing list, and while [1] still qualifies as on-topic (IMHO), the |
| 30 |
three messages following it in this sub-thread are off-topic here. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Ulrich |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
[1] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/565efeab6f253c402212fd8d8aa58945 |
Archives