1 |
Mike Gardiner <obz@g.o>, on Thu Aug 21, 2003 [01:11:39 PM] said: |
2 |
|
3 |
> In a lot of ways, for users or contributors, I think it boils down to |
4 |
> credit and acknowledgement, rather than as a legal hold or similar. The |
5 |
> standard method for giving credit for ebuilds submissions, that I was |
6 |
> introduced to at least, was to ensure the contributor was acknowledged |
7 |
> in the ChangeLog corresponding with the first commit of the package. |
8 |
> Something simple along the lines of, |
9 |
> |
10 |
> "Thanks to Some User <user@email> for the ebuild contribution". |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I guess to users this doesnt seem as concrete an acknowledgement as a |
13 |
> line like, |
14 |
> |
15 |
> # Copyright 2003 (c) Some User |
16 |
|
17 |
Hi; |
18 |
|
19 |
Speaking for myself, its not an atribution thing at all. |
20 |
I have no problem contributing to the kernel without any mention |
21 |
of me at all, or any of the many other projects I have submited |
22 |
stuff to.... its more an issue of why should I surrender rights |
23 |
to an entity, which may be currently piloted by paladins, but |
24 |
whose future I have no control over, without any clear |
25 |
justification. |
26 |
|
27 |
Paul |
28 |
set@×××××.com |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |