| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 27/03/12 03:04 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> You know, we have "Code Listing 2.1: Filesystem Example" in |
| 7 |
>> Section 4, we could always adjust that to have a /usr/portage |
| 8 |
>> partition in it (take a bit of space away from /home, or |
| 9 |
>> something) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> It doesn't recommend/require anything, but when users see it |
| 12 |
>> they'll think about it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> That isn't the way users read it, though. They read it and assume |
| 15 |
> that is precisely how they *need* to configure their disk layout. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> - Aaron |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Really? It's been a while since i hung out in #gentoo, but i was |
| 21 |
there pretty solidly for a couple of years and i don't recall any new |
| 22 |
user (to gentoo or linux) reporting in, saying they set up their |
| 23 |
disk(s) with all of those partitions. They pretty well always |
| 24 |
followed the "default partitioning scheme" listed in the table in 4.b |
| 25 |
(which is used for every other example on that chapter). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk9yEVoACgkQAJxUfCtlWe3EtgEAwr62YTL812ehPurzTJWT1sqr |
| 31 |
SUQhJzybaLlY0Rf2T6ABANqOtXDK+IbRTjLw1fcfjGHqWuYUAfqYnYtniN5ztwHK |
| 32 |
=Vi2z |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives