| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like |
| 4 |
> herds are empty. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the |
| 7 |
herds are not empty, but they have no maintainers. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop that |
| 10 |
> herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> What do you think? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
How many packages are in these two herds? If it's only a few, then |
| 15 |
this certainly makes sense. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ulrich |
Archives