Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:42:32
Message-Id: CAEdQ38F6ijTmpv1wDOz7tvtvZ3FP3s14=KPVfnvnN663-BuWqg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014 by "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina"
1 On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2 <zerochaos@g.o> wrote:
3 > On 07/10/2013 10:03 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
4 >> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:27:46PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
5 >>> The other thing we needed to do was completely remove the use of
6 >>> or building of binpkgs during the update_seed stage. Portage has
7 >>> no capability to check binpkg linking to ensure the binpkg was
8 >>> properly usable.
9 >> Can somebody actually please implement this, to run before the
10 >> binpkg merge phase?
11 >>
12 > Please be more specific, this is currently implemented...
13
14 He's talking about portage, not catalyst.