| 1 |
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 11:24, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:19:15PM +0100 or thereabouts, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I understand your viewpoint, but (as discussed in this thread) there are |
| 4 |
> > many criteria which will determine the success of the planet, some of which |
| 5 |
> > are impossible or difficult to measure effectively. Maybe you would like to |
| 6 |
> > suggest some targets which you feel would define an active planet? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> We could use some of the previously-discussed metrics (page views, number |
| 9 |
> of posts, etc.) but perhaps a better idea is simply asking our users. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> How about if we posted a question on survey.gentoo.org 3-6 months after the |
| 12 |
> service has been up that simply asks, "Do you find planet.gentoo.org to be |
| 13 |
> valuable?" If the "yes" rate is something less than X% (I'd suggest 33%) |
| 14 |
> then we kill it. If not, we leave it up and consider it a success. This |
| 15 |
> seems like a very fair, impartial way of gauging the impact that this |
| 16 |
> service has had on our community. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We should offer a parallel survey to developers only to gauge the impact |
| 19 |
on that community. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives