Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markus Nigbur <pYrania@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] VERY circular dependency
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:50:29
Message-Id: 20030928195018.56ab6d14.pYrania@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] VERY circular dependency by Andrew Gaffney
1 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:08:31 -0500
2 Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××××××××××.net> wrote:
3
4 > Alexander Futasz wrote:
5 > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:10:09 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
6 > >
7 > >>Daniel Robbins wrote:
8 > >>
9 > >>>On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:48, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
10 > >>>
11 > >>>
12 > >>>>upstairs sys-devel # qpkg -q -nc -I gimp-print
13 > >>>>media-gfx/gimp-print-4.3.20
14 > >>>>DEPENDED ON BY:
15 > >>>> media-gfx/gimp-print-4.3.20
16 > >>>
17 > >>>
18 > >>>Due to a bug in qpkg due to it not using the Portage API directly.
19 > >>>If you look in the ebuild, you'll see that no such dependency
20 > >exists>>(it's probably getting it from "!media-gfx/gimp-print-cups".
21 > >>
22 > >>Okay. Another thing....there is no media-gfx/gimp-print-cups.
23 > >
24 > >
25 > > Indeed, please file a bug then. http://bugs.gentoo.org Also you have
26 > >
27 > > a look at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23944 for qpkg's
28 > > dependency checking.
29 >
30 > Okay, I filed a bug. I know epm doesn't use the Portage API because
31 > its written in Perl, but does etcat?
32
33 gimp-print and gimp-print-cups were merged the other day..
34 removed the block.
35
36 --
37 Markus Nigbur
38 Gentoo Developer
39 http://www.gentoo.org