Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:51:20
Message-Id: 20100303015253.7930de6f@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2 by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:52:55 +0200
2 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 03/02/2010 08:27 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
5 > > Members of Gentoo Python Project have agreed to deprecate the following functions
6 > > in EAPI <=2:
7 > > - python_version()
8 > > - python_mod_exists()
9 > > - python_tkinter_exists()
10 > > - distutils_python_version()
11 > > - distutils_python_tkinter()
12 > >
13 > > These functions are already banned in EAPI >=3.
14 > >
15 > > 1. In this week, these functions will start printing deprecation warnings in older EAPIs.
16 > > 2. On 2010-07-01, these functions will start calling die().
17 > > (If any ebuilds in gentoo-x86 still call any of these functions on 2010-07-01,
18 > > then addition of calls to die() will be delayed.)
19 > > 3. On 2011-01-01, these functions will be removed.
20 > >
21 >
22 > Removing eclass functions like this is not allowed by current policy. If
23 > you want to do it, you should discuss about changing policy.
24
25 ?!
26
27 since when?
28
29 --
30 fonts, by design, by neglect
31 gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
32 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies