Archives
Archives
| From: | "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <zlin@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI clarifications to skel.ebuild EAPI usage | ||
| Date: | Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:51:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200803140351.43599.zlin@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] FYI clarifications to skel.ebuild EAPI usage by "Petteri Räty" |
||
| 1 | On Friday 14 March 2008 03:29:26 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 | > solar reported that he had ebuild submissions blindly using EAPI=1 so we |
| 3 | > hopefully made the text better reflect that it should not be used unless |
| 4 | > absolutely needed. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | 'Absolutely' is far too strong a word. A better wording would be 'unless |
| 7 | useful', or 'unless it would improve the quality of the ebuild'. For |
| 8 | non-system packages, the only thing stopping people from using EAPI 1 where |
| 9 | useful is ludditism. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Bo Andresen |
| 13 | Gentoo KDE Dev |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI clarifications to skel.ebuild EAPI usage | RB <aoz.syn@×××××.com> |