Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:11:59
Message-Id: CAMMrfH5x8_woRr4zretSz6TMoBt3J9LMWtUGMnprKcM+FvK=1A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching by "Michał Górny"
1 Yes. The manager can still parallelize prefetching, only consuming a build
2 job slot post fetch.
3 On Sep 6, 2012 11:49 AM, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
4
5 > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:13 -0700
6 > Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote:
7 >
8 > > One additional thought- re: the scenarios where we don't fetch to an
9 > > intermediate location, then transfer that contents into ${WORKDIR},
10 > > while a better name is needed, something along the lines of
11 > > RESTRICT=fetches-into-workdir comes to mind.
12 > >
13 > > Basically that restriction would be interpretted as "$WORKDIR must be
14 > > setup/preserved from invocation of src_fetch to actual building".
15 > >
16 > > Via that restrict, both scenarios should be addressed in full.
17 >
18 > Does separate src_fetch() provide any benefit in that scenario?
19 >
20 > --
21 > Best regards,
22 > Michał Górny
23 >