Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant?
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:12:32
Message-Id: 4AF8A20C.8000806@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant? by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > hmm, let's see, one package that was already broken under other C libraries
3 > broke under glibc-2.11. and it's already been fixed. of course, if you'd
4 > simply used bugzilla's search function, you wouldnt have to rhetorically
5 > wonder aloud.
6 > -mike
7
8 and I was all excited about new toolchain porting tracker, which never
9 came... the one bug (kdelibs) was all I had to fix... boo!
10
11 more rice!
12
13 :)