Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:43:16
Message-Id: robbat2-20101231T004158-951648905Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths by Mike Frysinger
1 On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:04:25PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > epatch was changed to auto-skip the first path element when it is absolute
3 > (starts with a slash). the reason was to avoid issues with patches touching
4 > files outside of $PWD (which is bad if sandbox is disabled).
5 +1 from me, but can we have a QA prefix on the ewarn output?
6
7 --
8 Robin Hugh Johnson
9 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
10 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
11 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>