From: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths | ||
Date: | Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:43:16 | ||
Message-Id: | robbat2-20101231T004158-951648905Z@orbis-terrarum.net | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths by Mike Frysinger |
1 | On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:04:25PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 | > epatch was changed to auto-skip the first path element when it is absolute |
3 | > (starts with a slash). the reason was to avoid issues with patches touching |
4 | > files outside of $PWD (which is bad if sandbox is disabled). |
5 | +1 from me, but can we have a QA prefix on the ewarn output? |
6 | |
7 | -- |
8 | Robin Hugh Johnson |
9 | Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
10 | E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
11 | GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths | Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: reject patches with relative paths | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |