1 |
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 13:54 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Even though I'm sure my personal opinion is clear, I don't have a strong |
4 |
> stake in the ALSA herd. The real reason why alsa-driver is not getting |
5 |
> any support behind it right now is that nobody is standing behind it. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> If someone wants to step up and take over maintenance of alsa-driver, |
8 |
> and put the required amount of time/effort into maintaining such a large |
9 |
> kernel code base outside of the kernel, then I can accept that. I can |
10 |
> accept that not everyone shares my views, and although I unintentionally |
11 |
> managed to frustrate the previous maintainer a few times, I did accept |
12 |
> that he was willing to stick by ideas just as I was prepared to stick by |
13 |
> mine. |
14 |
|
15 |
Lack of package maintainer, makes most all discussions about alsa-driver |
16 |
moot. Or any package lacking a maintainer. :) |
17 |
|
18 |
> Everyone who is claiming that alsa-driver works and in-kernel |
19 |
|
20 |
I personally want to see some chipset ID's. What exact chips people have |
21 |
that work, and don't work. Please provide the output of |
22 |
|
23 |
lspci -nn |
24 |
|
25 |
Only care about the line for your sound card. And if yours works or |
26 |
doesn't and with which driver, in-kernel, or external.. |
27 |
|
28 |
Then we can say grep kenrel driver sources, or etc for that chipset ID, |
29 |
and go from there :) |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
33 |
Gentoo/Java |