Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Greg Hasseler <ghassel1@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:24:21
Message-Id: 200504261624.24933.ghassel1@twcny.rr.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq by Henrik Brix Andersen
1 On Monday 25 April 2005 07:30 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote:
5 > > On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
6 > > > Hi,
7 > > >
8 > > > The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in
9 > > > more than a year, and it is superseded in every way by
10 > > > sys-power/cpufreqd (which, in turn, is actively maintained by
11 > > > upstream).
12 > > >
13 > > > There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo
14 > > > bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes
15 > > > to be useful.
16 > > >
17 > > > If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will
18 > > > add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now.
19 > > >
20 > > > Sincerely,
21 > > > Brix
22 > >
23 > > Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power
24 > > management guide at
25 > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should
26 > > probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or at a
27 > > minimum from the recommended daemon.
28 >
29 > Good catch - I've added Dennis to CC: on this mail :)
30 >
31 > Sincerely,
32 > Brix
33
34 Well, I was following the guide the other day so it was fresh in my mind :-D
35 Gosh I love the smell of new laptop!
36
37 -----------------------
38 Greg
39 ghassel1@××××××××.com
40 ghasseler@×××××.com
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list