1 |
Le 12/07/2012 16:12, Samuli Suominen a écrit : |
2 |
> On 07/11/2012 04:36 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: |
3 |
>> This package historically belongs to the gnustep herd, but ffcall |
4 |
>> support in |
5 |
>> gnustep has been deprecated for some time now in favor of libffi (in |
6 |
>> fact the |
7 |
>> USE-flag may go away soon) |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Also, I do not have the time to work on it, although it requires a |
10 |
>> bit |
11 |
>> of work: |
12 |
>> * switch to "new" upstream (recommending to grab CVS tarballs) at |
13 |
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/libffcall/ |
14 |
>> * a bunch of opened issues (parallel make/install, ldflags, |
15 |
>> execstacks, |
16 |
>> ...): |
17 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ffcall |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> So if you are interested, please add yourself to metadata.xml (and |
20 |
>> remove |
21 |
>> gnustep herd) and start bug sqashing. As a bonus, you will still |
22 |
>> have a |
23 |
>> backup |
24 |
>> herd (common-lisp), thoug a real maintainer would be great |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> Reverse RDEPEND for dev-libs/ffcall: |
27 |
>> dev-lang/gforth-0.7.0 |
28 |
>> dev-lisp/clisp-2.47-r1 dev-lisp/clisp-2.48-r1 |
29 |
>> dev-lisp/clisp-2.48-r2 |
30 |
>> gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.20.1:!libffi |
31 |
>> gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.24.0-r1:!libffi |
32 |
>> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> libffi should be a full replacement and more widely adapted variant. |
35 |
> isn't it time to let this simply fade away (lastrite)? |
36 |
|
37 |
Well, after checking gforth, it looks like it supports both, through |
38 |
automagic |
39 |
dependencies in configure, so it is fixable. But clisp still has a hard |
40 |
depend on ffcall, and no support for libffi |