| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Andrew Cowie wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 00:37, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 7 |
> > The high-profile public keyservers share keys. It shouldn't matter in |
| 8 |
> > most cases. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Apparently, *pgp.mit.edu and *.keyserver.net do NOT share keys. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> For some reason (this is anecdotal, but from about 3 months ago on this |
| 13 |
> list) the admins of the latter ignore the former, so the interconnect |
| 14 |
> has never been established. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> [Thus though most developers register with a keyserver, there are large |
| 17 |
> gaps from any given user's perspective based on which keyserver cluster |
| 18 |
> (mit.edu, pgp.com, keyserver.net, etc) they are pulling from] |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> FWIW, I would recommend that Gentoo just pick a keyserver cluster as |
| 21 |
> authoritative and stick to it. People seem to regard MIT's well... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Also for what it's worth, I have |
| 24 |
keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net |
| 25 |
and it seems to find everyone. That might be a misperception on my part, |
| 26 |
though. |
| 27 |
- -- |
| 28 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 29 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc) |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iD8DBQFAqhyfQa6M3+I///cRAgdfAKCKySs9GNDxXwHq095E7REvfeYI/QCfdbmf |
| 34 |
F23a5mcOegDwxbs2V7TklH4= |
| 35 |
=lNzk |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives