From: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | "Benjamin Smee (strerror)" <strerror@g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour | ||
Date: | Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:27:45 | ||
Message-Id: | 43DFC544.3080702@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 | > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:06:35 +0000 "Benjamin Smee (strerror)" |
3 | > <strerror@g.o> wrote: |
4 | > | On Tuesday 31 January 2006 15:47, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 | > | > For packages in the second group, not using a USE flag is silly. |
6 | > | |
7 | > | I take it you are agreeing we should have a USE flag for these |
8 | > | ebuilds? |
9 | > |
10 | > For packages where /etc entries are "wanted by some, not wanted by |
11 | > some", yes. |
12 | |
13 | I finally came up with an idea for this that satisfies my desire to not |
14 | recompile the package to get e.g. a logrotate file. Have the flag |
15 | control whether it's installed to /etc or to /usr/share/doc. |
16 | |
17 | Thoughts? |
18 | |
19 | Thanks, |
20 | Donnie |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour | Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour | Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour | Rob Holland <tigger@g.o> |