| 1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 11.06.2017 kell 11:12, kirjutas William Hubbs: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 05:35:53PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 06/11/2017 05:24 PM, David Seifert wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > We can always patch the eclass at that point if that is still a |
| 6 |
> > > > big |
| 7 |
> > > > concern, but I fundamentally agree with William on this, |
| 8 |
> > > > starting |
| 9 |
> > > > point |
| 10 |
> > > > should be fixing it upstream, so can start with a tracking bug |
| 11 |
> > > > on |
| 12 |
> > > > affected packages. |
| 13 |
> > > > |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Here's a deal: you can start filing + fixing them. |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > The [tracker] is already started, it was determined to add QA |
| 19 |
> > warning |
| 20 |
> > with info on filing upstream bugs in [bug 426262] and the proper |
| 21 |
> > solution is again iterated in [bug 546614], so its not like this is |
| 22 |
> > a |
| 23 |
> > new approach that is being suggested, but sure, we should all file |
| 24 |
> > bugs |
| 25 |
> > when we encounter them. |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > References: |
| 28 |
> > [tracker] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530632 |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > [bug 426262] |
| 31 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262 |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > [bug 546614] |
| 34 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546614 |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> It seems that the proper fix to this, even for a package that won't |
| 37 |
> do |
| 38 |
> the fix upstream is to use WANT_AUTOCONF in the ebuild to force the |
| 39 |
> version of autoconf you need. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
No. It appears you don't know how WANT_AUTOCONF works. |
Archives