1 |
On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:55 +0200 |
2 |
flameeyes@×××××.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> - bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what |
5 |
> clearer than moving them out of sys-*? |
6 |
|
7 |
"system" and the sys-* categories don't have much of a relationsship, |
8 |
so that's no argument IMO. |
9 |
|
10 |
> Yes these are a lot of moves, sincerely I think sys-* categories are a |
11 |
> bit bloated as they are, and I suppose we should start moving the |
12 |
> things around rather than waiting forever ad ever.. |
13 |
|
14 |
I don't consider that to be a valid reason when looking at the |
15 |
following numbers: |
16 |
|
17 |
$ ls -1 /srv/portage/porttree/dev-util/ |wc -l |
18 |
265 |
19 |
$ ls -1 /srv/portage/porttree/sys-devel/ |wc -l |
20 |
41 |
21 |
|
22 |
~40 packages isn't much for any category, if you really want to |
23 |
relocate packages you could just as well eliminate the entire category. |
24 |
|
25 |
Marius |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |