Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Seifert <soap@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:09:50
Message-Id: 1513267778.29051.2.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/ by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 15:04 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
2 > Michał Górny schrieb:
3 > > Breaking the dependency tree was a *honest* mistake on the person
4 > > who
5 > > reverted this commit.
6 > >
7 > > Andrey pretty clearly stated that he did this *on purpose*.
8 >
9 > The removal of the package in violation of Gentoo policy was fully
10 > intentional from what I can see. There was no 30-day prior notice +
11 > p.mask which is required before removing a package.
12 >
13 > But even that it is not bad, just fix that mistake.
14 >
15 >
16 > Best regards,
17 > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
18 >
19 >
20 >
21
22 So I can add tons of broken packages, sprinkled over different days,
23 hidden between other valid bumps, and can then tell people they need to
24 lastrite this stuff first and do the 30-day rain dance? Come on, even
25 for Gentoo standards, that's absolutely ridiculous.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/ Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o>