Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ralph Seichter <gentoo@××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Python application with multiple new dependencies
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:05:12
Message-Id: 87wojwfdkh.fsf@ra.horus-it.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Python application with multiple new dependencies by Mike Gilbert
* Mike Gilbert:

> Speaking on behalf of the python team, we are not particularly keen on > maintaining libraries that are only used by a single package. We have > too many packages to care for already.
I agree. I know about the various risks of dynamically installing dependencies, but "pip install X" in virtual environments is very useful nonetheless. Gentoo does not offer an equivalent (I'm not judging, just saying), and it seems to me that is causing the Python team a large amount of work, eating up resources that could be spent elsewhere.
> Not everything needs to be handled in an ebuild; often it just > increases the amount of busy work you end up doing.
Ebuilds are great when an application needs config files, init scripts, users/groups, and when app A connects to app B (for example, if there is a milter there will also be an MTA calling it). Two of the milters I am using happen to be written in Python. One requires pymilter, so I created a PR introducing a pymilter ebuild. I'd rather avoid that ebuild, because pymilter is an interface to libmilter and of little use of its own, but other apps depend on it. -Ralph