Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: change of the default value for EHG_REVISION (mercurial.eclass)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:32:32
Message-Id: CAJ0EP42F0dVBDB=J4pezBJDTR1cB0NZVqvFbGkG33nO03qVS4w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] RFC: change of the default value for EHG_REVISION (mercurial.eclass) by Christoph Junghans
1 On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o> wrote:
2 > With nelchael's retirement I (with backup from djc) will take over the
3 > maintenance of mercurial.eclass. As one of the first things I would
4 > like to change the default value of EHG_REVISION.
5 >
6 > EHG_REVISION defines the revision/branch/tag to be checkout in src_unpack.
7 > The current default is "tip", which identifies the most recent revision.
8 > This can lead to unwanted branch changes (see
9 > <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380947#c16>) as the branch in
10 > which tip resides is not fixed.
11 > The new default should be "default", which is mercurial's default name
12 > for the main branch.
13 >
14 > Looking at the packages using mercurial.eclass
15 > (<http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/eclass-usage/mercurial.txt>) the
16 > above change shouldn't cause any problems (some packages already use
17 > EHG_REVISION="default" to avoid branch changes), but I will wait
18 > another week before committing the change.
19 >
20 > --
21 > Christoph Junghans
22 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/
23 >
24
25 Sounds good to me; using "tip" never made sense to me either.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: change of the default value for EHG_REVISION (mercurial.eclass) Rafael Goncalves Martins <rafaelmartins@g.o>