1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:50:34 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: |
4 |
> On 17 April 2015 at 02:22, Bob Wya <bob.mt.wya@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > Are you maintaining an overlay listed in Layman? If not then it's pretty |
7 |
> > obvious that |
8 |
> > you're just trolling the mailing list and wasting a lot of folk's time... |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I'm not sure that's the case. Its easy enough to maintain an overlay. Its |
13 |
> easy enough to get yourself into the primary permission bits to be major |
14 |
> contributor to an overlay listed in layman. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> But that doesn't really make you a useful gentoo developer, its just a |
17 |
> stepping stone. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> The barrier to entry to making useful changes to the CVS tree is presently |
20 |
> several orders of magnitude more daunting than contributing to an overlay. |
21 |
|
22 |
Nevertheless it is quite doable. And from my personal experience it |
23 |
is definitely worth it. Before becoming a dev I had my own overlay |
24 |
in layman for years. Training gives you a much deeper understanding |
25 |
of both development process and community relations, this is like an |
26 |
evolution to another step. |
27 |
|
28 |
As for overlays, their function is important, but should not be |
29 |
overestimated. In my vision main function of overlays is sandboxing. |
30 |
Sandboxing in many aspects: for either packages too new or immature |
31 |
to be added to the main tree; or for contributions from interested |
32 |
users who are still not devs; or, perhaps, for packages with too |
33 |
small target audience to care enough to put them to the tree. |
34 |
|
35 |
I don't believe in talks about "high quality overlays". All |
36 |
overlays I ever tried have lesser quality than the main tree, |
37 |
though some are a bit lesser, while others are horrible. Of course |
38 |
there may be exceptions, but I know none. |
39 |
|
40 |
Best regards, |
41 |
Andrew Savchenko |