Archives
Archives
| From: | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | rich0@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29) | ||
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:04:45 | ||
| Message-Id: | c3d76c2a-0920-d244-de7b-dc50f3d41e80@iee.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29) by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On 29/07/18 21:01, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > <snip> |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Why not stick the repos in /var/repos and not /var/db/repos? If we're |
| 5 | > just making up paths, why not make up a shorter one? I don't think |
| 6 | > any other linux distros use /var/db... |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | *BSD I believe .. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |