1 |
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:05:35 +0200 |
4 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> > So why are these features behind use flags? |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> For compatibility with ${PYTHON_USEDEP}. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Why not fix PYTHON_USEDEP? |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
An alternative would be insert some logic in the python eclasses to |
13 |
parse PYTHON_REQ_USE, and generate different dependencies for pypy-bin |
14 |
versus the rest of the python implementations. Or maybe redesign the |
15 |
way we handle that entirely. |
16 |
|
17 |
In any case, pypy-bin was added to the tree without any thought as to |
18 |
how to implement the eclass changes, so I have removed it and reverted |
19 |
the changes to package.use.force. |