| 1 |
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> The other thing is that would put a mandatory system requirement on |
| 3 |
> layman which many of the devs would be opposed to. But, there is an open |
| 4 |
> bug calling for it to be merged with portage... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Honestly, native support for overlays is something paludis gets right |
| 7 |
- the main tree is just another tree and you prioritize them. What I |
| 8 |
don't like about paludis is that it exposes a lot of implementation |
| 9 |
details in its config files that are probably best defaulted away |
| 10 |
(unless that has changed), but having /etc/portage/repositories.d with |
| 11 |
a bunch of files that each contain a URI and a priority and maybe |
| 12 |
other optional parameters would be nice. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Rich |
Archives