Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Aisha Tammy <gentoo.dev@×××××.cc> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, pr@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [REVIEW] News Item - 2020-10-17-display-manager-init | ||
| Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:50:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | u8sbxpei8@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [REVIEW] News Item - 2020-10-17-display-manager-init by Aisha Tammy |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, Aisha Tammy wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > and remove 'xdm' from the default runlevel and add 'display-manager': |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > rc-update del xdm default |
| 6 | > rc-update add display-manager default |
| 7 | |
| 8 | So, no automatic upgrade path for users? I am asking again, what is the |
| 9 | rationale for renaming? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I agree that "display-manager" might be a slightly better name than |
| 12 | "xdm", but that's more than outweighted by the trouble that the renaming |
| 13 | would impose on users. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Ulrich |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [REVIEW] News Item - 2020-10-17-display-manager-init | Aisha Tammy <gentoo.dev@×××××.cc> |