From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits | ||
Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:19:41 | ||
Message-Id: | AANLkTi=TO4WTEDbTa0yQEMDKwBRHADBRqvZVXH+A=yXw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits by "Andreas K. Huettel" |
1 | On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 | > The @gentoo.org email addresses are advantageous because they provide a pre-existing identification. Which is as strong as we will ever get with this mechanism (I think). |
3 | |
4 | no, it really doesnt. when we make someone a dev, they give us a ssh |
5 | key and a gpg key. that is all we need. the gpg key being bound to a |
6 | @gentoo.org e-mail address is completely meaningless. |
7 | -mike |