Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:02:26
Message-Id: 46059ce10602281355i416ba449i7776fd79a4fa8041@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Renat Lumpau
1 On 2/28/06, Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when a user
4 > > files a report at bugs.gentoo.org
5 >
6 > I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to figure out
7 > which QA issues are important and which are less so. A QA team member's opinion
8 > (personal attacks, whatever) should be an important input but not the final say.
9
10 eh, see, from what I can tell you are just deciding to make it complicated.
11
12 Do a quick bugzie search for bugs reported in the last week by
13 ciaranm, I don't think he's singling you out. I think he's responding
14 to your stubbornness.
15 >
16 > --
17 > Renat Lumpau all things web-apps
18 > C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA
19 > America - land of the free*
20 > *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c.
21 >
22 >
23 >
24
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o>