| 1 |
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò |
| 2 |
<flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
> That being the case, splitting them in multiple packages might indeed be |
| 4 |
> a better option. Yes I know I'm the one pushing for using a single |
| 5 |
> package — as long as it doesn't have licensing issues of course. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Yup, a combined package that is fetch-restricted with 57 files in the |
| 8 |
SRC_URI isn't really something that anybody would like. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Probably makes sense to have a few tiers: |
| 11 |
1. Free |
| 12 |
2. Non-free, but redistributable |
| 13 |
3. Non-free, nonredistributable, but fetchable (maybe combine with #2) |
| 14 |
4. Non-fetchable - do not combine. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Rich |
Archives