1 |
On 1/8/08, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:38:07 -0800 |
3 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> > > Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the |
6 |
> > > correct way to fix a repoman message is to start nuking arch |
7 |
> > > keywords, ignoring what it does to the rest of the tree. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > ...for the architecture in question which is proving incapable of |
10 |
> > keeping up with the state of the tree as it is... |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Sorry, you fail. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying that |
15 |
> packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because no-one's |
16 |
> maintaining them? |
17 |
|
18 |
Of course they do |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |