| 1 |
Dnia 2014-01-17, o godz. 17:51:41 |
| 2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > What do you think? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Excellent. I think it could quickly become the prefered protage |
| 8 |
> storage format, although a loopback mount is needed. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You can use sys-fs/squashfuse :). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Though honestly I'd prefer if portage was able to take squashfs image |
| 13 |
path in repos.conf and mount it locally for build-time. This will have |
| 14 |
the extra advantage that we wouldn't have to worry about remounting it |
| 15 |
after sync. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Michał Górny |
Archives