1 |
Hi all, |
2 |
|
3 |
All forum moderators and admins try to make the forum clean and after |
4 |
that they try to help the best they can, as all other users. So the |
5 |
moderators/admins do not need to know how Gentoo itself works |
6 |
internally, they just need to be mature and responsible. |
7 |
|
8 |
Now I agree that regular users see moderators as higher members, and |
9 |
that's why Gentoo Foundation should take care choosing |
10 |
moderators/admins. That's what the quiz should be about. Gentoo |
11 |
internal knowledge should be optional, although highly appreciated. If |
12 |
Moderators/admins become staff, they may start to be seen as official |
13 |
support, and I don't think that's something desirable right now, at |
14 |
least not to increase the work of moderators/admins. |
15 |
|
16 |
As to local moderators (i'm one of them) I believe they should take |
17 |
whatever global moderators take, they are moderators as well, although |
18 |
they have a lot less work. Giving all moderators a developer or staff |
19 |
status is not needed, although admins should be Gentoo developers or |
20 |
staff because of their higher responsibility. |
21 |
|
22 |
Also, I truly doubt that any moderator would refuse to be considered |
23 |
a Gentoo staff or anything gentoo related, otherwise why choose to |
24 |
give their free time to the forums? |
25 |
|
26 |
That's just my 2 cents as a local moderator. |
27 |
|
28 |
Ricardo Loureiro |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:09:41 +0200 |
32 |
Haas Wernfried <w.haas@×××××××××××××××××××.at> wrote: |
33 |
|
34 |
> Hi, |
35 |
> With reference to the recent thread about this GLEP's draft [1] |
36 |
> we're resurrecting the discussion and would like keep you updated |
37 |
> on the latest changes: |
38 |
> 1) The term developer has been dropped and replaced by staff. ;-) |
39 |
> 2) The GLEP is now listed on the GLEP page as GLEP 38 [2] as an |
40 |
> official GLEP. |
41 |
> 3) The moderators guide is available (Curtis already posted that to |
42 |
> the list, just a reminder to have a look at it as well). [3] |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Now would be a great time for everyone to read it and give us some |
45 |
> feedback. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/28985 |
48 |
> [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0038.html |
49 |
> [3] http://curtis119.no-ip.org/forum-guide.xml |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
> -- |
53 |
> Fppmpppffpppmpfpffmffmppmpm Mfpmmmmmmfmm |
54 |
> fpp.mfpmmmmmmfmm@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.mmmmm |
55 |
> f.mmmfmp |
56 |
> mfpfmpfmppfm://fpfppffpmmpppff.ppmfmfmpm.mmmfmp/~mmmppmpppmpppppmff |
57 |
> ppfppp/ http://www.namesuppressed.com/kenny/ |
58 |
> -- |
59 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
60 |
> |
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0EC0 |